That semblance or presumption of authority sustaining the acts of a public officer which is derived from his apparent title to the office or from a writ or other process in his hands apparently valid and regular. State v. Oates, 80 Wis. 634, 57 N. W. 290, 39 Am. St. Rep. 912; Wyatt v. Monroe, 27 Tex. 208.
Related Library Documents:
The material contained in this website should not be construed as legal advice. Please do your own due diligence to verify the information before using it. It is advised that if you have any doubt you seek your own legal or lawful council. Please cross-check any materials to verify the legitimacy; due-diligence. Nothing on this website creates an attorney-client relationship with anyone using or reading it.
We are not lawyers.
The above is the legal course the Brunsons used to bring their case before the Supreme Court. The link above is an affiliate link .
The views and opinions expressed in these materials do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the website owner.
“Between 75% to 90% of all lawyers are either incompetent, dishonest, or both.” Earl Warren (former) Chief Justice US Supreme Court [A Treatise On Arrest And False Imprisonment , page 59]
“Wisdom is the principal thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding.” Proverbs 4:7
POPULAR
FORMS
OPINIONS
LINKS